An Abuja High Court on Thursday struck out the criminal charges filed by the Federal Government against the senator representing Kogi Central, Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, bringing an end to a high-profile legal case that generated nationwide debate.
The decision followed a Notice of Discontinuance filed by the Office of the Attorney-General of the Federation, leading the court to formally withdraw the criminal defamation and related charges earlier brought against the lawmaker.
The case, which attracted significant public attention, arose from comments allegedly made by Akpoti-Uduaghan during a televised interview. It sparked sustained discourse on freedom of expression, political accountability, and the appropriate limits of prosecutorial authority in a democratic society.
The Notice of Discontinuance, dated December 12, 2025, terminated proceedings in suit number FHC/ABJ/CR/195/2025. Justice C. N. Oji, who presided over the matter, acknowledged the notice and accordingly struck out the case.
In his remarks, Justice Oji noted that the development highlighted the importance of restraint in the exercise of prosecutorial powers, expressing hope that the decision would promote respect for the rule of law and strengthen democratic norms.
READ ALSO: JUST IN: National Assembly Reopens Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Office
Counsel to the Federal Government confirmed the withdrawal of the charges in open court, stating that the decision was taken in line with the provisions of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act and in the overall interest of justice and public confidence in the legal system.
Reacting to the ruling, Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan described the outcome as a vindication, reaffirming her faith in the judiciary and the rule of law. She said she remained committed to serving her constituents and defending the democratic rights of Nigerians, while expressing gratitude to her legal team and supporters.
The striking out of the charges follows months of legal controversy and public debate, with several civil society organisations and rights groups previously criticising the prosecution as an attempt to suppress free speech and political participation.